DoctorZ banned for posting links to specifically anti-gay hate groups (1 Viewer)

[GLaDOS]

Issued to: DoctorZ
Issued by: Matt Derrick
Ban date: Jun 05 2020
End date: Never
Reason: trolling, hate speech, posting links to hate groups (with specifically anti-gay policies)

The posts below were removed from this thread here:

Stay Out of Minneapolis/St. Paul For Now | Squat the Planet

Just a heads up for all you travelers out there. There are riots going on in the Twin Cities at the time of this posting over a black man killed by Minneapolis Police last Monday during his arrest. Streets are blocked off. Neighborhoods are on fire. A murder. Entire city blocks destroyed...

squattheplanet.com

...as this is where the subject of the thread kinda went off the rails and @DoctorZ started spewing his personal politics that I believe were 'offensive to the community' as we have stated we have a right to remove in our forum rules.

specifically, this user posted links espouting how great 'the constitution party' and Don Blankenship is, both of which are severely against gay rights, as you will see quoted below (thank you @iamwhatiam).

As the first person to be banned under our new policy, I have started a thread poll for folks to vote on whether this ban was justified or not based on community votes.

 

[DoctorZ]

This is 100% Incorrect. Trump fuels hateful bullshit nearly every single time he opens his mouth.

I guess we'll have to agree to disagree on our President. I see him as one of the best Presidents we've had since Ronald Regan.

 

[Deleted member 125]

I guess we'll have to agree to disagree on our President. I see him as one of the best Presidents we've had since Ronald Regan.

You are a moron.

 

[Dameon]

I guess we'll have to agree to disagree on our President. I see him as one of the best Presidents we've had since Ronald Regan.

Ah yes, Ronald Reagan, the man responsible for putting all of our mentally ill people on the streets. So very great.

 

[Matt Derrick]

I guess we'll have to agree to disagree on our President. I see him as one of the best Presidents we've had since Ronald Regan.

if that's your honest opinion you might be in violation of our 'i am not an asshole' policy:

added 'asshole check' to new user registration form! | Squat the Planet

Just a little FYI to the community, I've made a slight change to the requirements for new users that want to sign up for an account. Since we've had a handful of bigoted users come on lately that obviously did not read the rules or the intro PM or the intro email or the Guide to Using StP...

squattheplanet.com

 

[Coywolf]

Our President had nothing to do with this. Our Governor didn't handle it very well though. The riots have ended in the Twin Cities, and it has been stated on the News that the curfew, is still in effect from 10pm to 4am each night, does NOT apply to homeless people.

Ohhhh really...? Trump has everything to do with this.

Trump directly telling police to 'not be nice' to suspects

 

[Coywolf]

Either way, that BS aside....thanks for keeping people informed on what is going on up there in the twin cities.

 

[Bushpig]

I guess we'll have to agree to disagree on our President. I see him as one of the best Presidents we've had since Ronald Regan.

To paraphrase what may or may not be a quote by Voltaire, I may disagree wth what you say, but I shall defend to the death your right to say it.

But goddamn, that shit got funny with that last sentence!

 

[iamwhatiam]

Fuck Trump and fuck anyone who supports that twitter crybaby in chief. After a couple days of rioting President Cheetofuck has such a hard-on to label antifa as a terrorist organization yet for the past several years has been quiet on white supremacists groups even going so far as to say how good of people they are. Seriously GTFO of here with that nonsense dude

 

[Deleted member 125]

I may disagree wth what you say, but I shall defend to the death your right to say it.

This isnt saywhateveryouwantwithnoconsequences.com if @DoctorZ is a trump fan he can fuck right off.

Stp is under no obligation to host peoples support of racist views under the guise of "MuH fReE sPeEcH!"

 

[Hudson]

When you have every past President and multiple lifelong military generals saying something is wrong with this oompa lloompa fucker, then there's something wrong with the guy.

How can you defend someone who wants to deploy combat troops in their own country. That's straight out of the book "How do you start a dictatorship"

Combat troops dude. I did ten years in the Army man. And do you know what i learned in the Army? How to point and shoot a fucking gun. How to fight in a war.

They don't teach COMBAT TROOPS on how to uphold peoples constitutional rights or on how to police. They teach them how to kill.

What the fuck is wrong with this world?

Sorry I got a little heated there; this guys says it better than I do.

Former Joint Chiefs Chairman Condemns Trump's Threat To Use Military At Protests

In rare remarks, retired Gen. Martin Dempsey rebuked the president's threat to use military troops against protesters as "dangerous," saying it would hurt relations between the military and civilians.

www.npr.org

 

[Bushpig]

This isnt saywhateveryouwantwithnoconsequences.com if @DoctorZ is a trump fan he can fuck right off.

Stp is under no obligation to host peoples support of racist views under the guise of "MuH fReE sPeEcH!"

I, in NO WAY, support racist views. But I don't wanna see someone lynched because he supports someone other than me. He could just be a fucking idiot. I don't like Trump any more than you. Trump is a racist, sexist, idiot. All the bad shit about him is true.

However, @DoctorZ hasn't said anything that I feel violates the rules. He hasn't said anything racist himself. Just that he supports Trump. Is @DoctorZ a racist? I dunno. But I know several people (even blacks) who are dumb enough to think Trump is good. And a lot of those people are pretty fucking far from racist. Just dumb.

I DO think that @DoctorZ would be wise to be careful if he isn't racist. And if he has a problem with blacks or any other race, he can fuck the fuck off and neither me, nor anybody else will miss him.

 

[DoctorZ]

Well I'm not about to address all the HATE speech that my post incited. What I will say is that I did NOT vote for Donald Trump. He is too liberal for my political tastes. Since the early 1990's I have been a Constitution Party Supporter. I believe in FREEDOM, and that's what I thought this Board stood for. No one is free in a Socialist Dictatorship, which is the direction our country is headed in.

I support Don Blankenship for President. For those that don't know about the Constitution Party, check out their web site:
Constitution Party - http://www.constitutionparty.com/

 

[iamwhatiam]

I believe in FREEDOM, and that's what I thought this Board stood for. No one is free in a Socialist Dictatorship, which is the direction our country is headed in.

I support Don Blankenship for President. For those that don't know about the Constitution Party, check out their web site:
Constitution Party - http://www.constitutionparty.com/

Are you fucking serious??? Here is just one of the principles from the website you linked:

"No government may legitimately authorize or define marriage or family relations contrary to what God has instituted. We are opposed to any judicial ruling or amending the U.S. Constitution or any state constitution re-defining marriage.
We reject the notion that homosexuals, transgenders or those who are sexually deviant are any more deserving of legal favor or special protection than any other individual. We oppose all efforts to impose a new sexual legal order through any courts or legislatures. We stand against so-called “sexual orientation” and “hate crime” statutes that attempt to legitimize sexual deviancy or stifle public opposition to its expression."

You say you are for freedom, but your party just sounds like another religious fundamentalist group that would love to see gay conversion camps legalized and encouraged. A party that would turn its head when a transgender or gay person gets assaulted or killed for just being who they are. Just another group who would deny me the right to marry someone I love or adopt a child because....GOD SAYS SO.

Yeah...it sounds like maybe you aren't on the right board.

 

[iamwhatiam]

Your "party of freedom" also opposes a woman's right to abort a fetus, EVEN IN CASES OF RAPE AND INCEST.

Your party opposes my right to view pornography.

And Don Blankenship sounds like a xenophobic asshole. No thanks

 

[Bushpig]

I did NOT vote for Donald Trump. He is too liberal for my political tastes.

I tried. You're on your own, pal.

 

[DoctorZ]

Are you fucking serious??? Here is just one of the principles from the website you linked:

"No government may legitimately authorize or define marriage or family relations contrary to what God has instituted. We are opposed to any judicial ruling or amending the U.S. Constitution or any state constitution re-defining marriage.
We reject the notion that homosexuals, transgenders or those who are sexually deviant are any more deserving of legal favor or special protection than any other individual. We oppose all efforts to impose a new sexual legal order through any courts or legislatures. We stand against so-called “sexual orientation” and “hate crime” statutes that attempt to legitimize sexual deviancy or stifle public opposition to its expression."

You say you are for freedom, but your party just sounds like another religious fundamentalist group that would love to see gay conversion camps legalized and encouraged. A party that would turn its head when a transgender or gay person gets assaulted or killed for just being who they are. Just another group who would deny me the right to marry someone I love or adopt a child because....GOD SAYS SO.

Yeah...it sounds like maybe you aren't on the right board.

Who gave our Government the right to redefine the meaning of words? Who gave the Government the right to force me to give (taxpayer) money to causes I do NOT believe in? Government has no business in Social Issues. Social Issues are the church's domain. The purpose of Government is to maintain order and protect our sovereign boarders, and to some extent regulate it's currency.

"Special protections" is another name for "Master Race." Who was the last person to try and establish a Master Race? Adolph Hitler! So how free was Nazi Germany? I guarantee you, you wouldn't be floating around the countryside on freights, hitch-hiking, or camping out in abandon warehouses in Nazi Germany. You'd be in a concentration camp, and that's the direction the world is currently heading in--so just keep believing in that ideology.

 

[DoctorZ]

Your "party of freedom" also opposes a woman's right to abort a fetus, EVEN IN CASES OF RAPE AND INCEST.

Your party opposes my right to view pornography.

And Don Blankenship sounds like a xenophobic asshole. No thanks

1. What about the fetus's rights, do you believe a fetus is sub-human?
2. Viewing pornography is NOT a right, it's something you do in private--Government has no right to regulate what you do in private. Where on the Constitution Party's web site did you see that?

 

[DoctorZ]

Do you all think we should continue this discussion in this thread? We're off topic. Why not start a new thread? You could call it: Why not vote Constitution Party in the next election.....

 

[iamwhatiam]

Social Issues are the church's domain.

"Special protections" is another name for "Master Race." Who was the last person to try and establish a Master Race? Adolph Hitler! So how free was Nazi Germany? I guarantee you, you wouldn't be floating around the countryside on freights, hitch-hiking, or camping out in abandon warehouses in Nazi Germany. You'd be in a concentration camp, and that's the direction the world is currently heading in--so just keep believing in that ideology.

Wrong. Churches have no place in deciding social issues beyond the doors of their church. You have a right to worship whatever God you believe in, but you do not have the right to impose your beliefs on my quality of life. Your party would deny me the right to marry, adopt a child, or protect me from unjust treatment in the workplace or on the streets due to my sexuality.

And I don't even understand how you are jumping from "special protections" to master races and concentration camps in your second post??????

1. What about the fetus's rights, do you believe a fetus is sub-human?
2. Viewing pornography is NOT a right, it's something you do in private--Government has no right to regulate what you do in private. Where on the Constitution Party's web site did you see that?

1. I believe in a woman's right to choose what she does with her own body, and that includes what is in her body. Do you think if a father rapes his 13 year old daughter, that daughter should go ahead and have the baby?
2. I have a right to view pornography as defined by the Supreme Court Viewing Rights – The Constitutional Right to View Erotic Material - National Coalition Against Censorship - https://ncac.org/news/blog/viewing-rights-the-constitutional-right-to-view-erotic-material but your party would intrude upon my privacy in my own home:
https://www.constitutionparty.com/assets/National-Platform-Full-Version.pdf (PAGE 10) " Pornography, obscenity and sexually oriented businesses are a distortion of the true nature of sex created by God for the procreative union between one man and one woman in the holy bonds of matrimony. This results in emotional, physical, spiritual and financial costs to individuals, families and communities. "

Feel free to worship whatever God of your choice, but keep God out of government and keep God out of my damn bedroom.